Standard Four
Candidates design, develop, implement, and evaluate technology-rich learning environments within a supportive community of practice.
Candidates collaborate with their peers and subject matter experts to analyze learners, develop and design instruction, and evaluate its impact on learners.
4.1
Development of instructional tech.
SUMMER 2019
During the summer of 2019, I was tasked with creating a video of a tool that has transformed my classroom. This youtube video is a great example of standard 4.1's expectation of analyzing and evaluating a resource. In this 7 minute tutorial, I covered all of the classroom screens affordances and features. This project allowed me to design and develop a video to share an application I know very well. I was able to share it and have different feedback opportunities with my peers in my class.
Candidates lead their peers in designing and implementing technology-supported learning.
4.2
Problems in instructional Design
FALL 2019
This artifact is an example of my leadership to create a cohesive template for my group. I sent out 3 templates, had group mates choose the one they thought was put together the best and then used that information to help shape and lead the group to a good grade. This powerpoint was a chance for our group to show ,not tell.
This video was the final project for my class in distance learning. This asynchronous presentation focused on the web 2.0 community and how it is ever-evolving and changing in our classrooms. The purpose of this assignment was to share with others about the possibilities of web 2.0 in other classrooms. I covered a multitude of different applications and programs that teachers could use to bring in web 2.0 applications.
4.3
Candidates analyze and interpret data and artifacts and reflect on the effectiveness of the design, development and implementation of technology supported instruction and learning to enhance their professional growth.
Distance Learning
SUMMER 2018